Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Emily Clement's avatar

I would caution against anyone deriving from this that the Scotch-Irish of western Virginia held--in general--a moral opposition to enslavement as a thing to do. The less mountainous south was geographically perfect for plantations, so the institution entrenched itself there for economic reasons. The more hill-based Scotch-Irish, if wealthy enough, were likely to raise cattle, not cotton, so being large-scale slave-holders wasn't practical. But owning a few domestic workers was prestigious. Some of these were my ancestors, and I've discovered black distant cousins who know themselves to be descended from (for example) the "comfort woman" of our mutual g-g-g-grandfather. Similar info turns up in numerous wills. Beyond this observation, I agree with the trends your thesis suggests.

Expand full comment
Judith Matlock's avatar

Thanks for this great summary, TC. May I be so bold as to recommend Arthur Herman's "How the Scots Invented the Modern World," which outlines the history of the Scots' movement of their values, sensibilities, organizational priorities and most importantly, their viewpoint and downright cussedness to the West, Australia, and Southern Asia in the areas colonized by the Brits. My own ancestors are from areas north of Durham and Newcastle and Tyrone County, Northern Ireland, who moved along due to famine, unemployment and religious differences. I attribute much of their "cussedness" to their lifelong lack of sunlight.

Expand full comment
42 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?