I agree with all the points you made and was less pulled into the Obama romance because of his inexperience.
Doesn't it make sense, however, to think about who other than Biden in case he suffers an appreciable decline or becomes incapacitated. Life expectancy for men in the US is 75. You are envisioning Biden beginning a second term at…
I agree with all the points you made and was less pulled into the Obama romance because of his inexperience.
Doesn't it make sense, however, to think about who other than Biden in case he suffers an appreciable decline or becomes incapacitated. Life expectancy for men in the US is 75. You are envisioning Biden beginning a second term at around the age of 83. Cardiovascular disease, strokes and prostate cancer are common to men his age and younger
As far as options, I would certainly wouldn't limit it to Buttigieg, but I do think he will have had quite a bit more of it than Obama and in the nuts and bolts and results departments. His work can be measured. Then of course who else -- any governors other than Mr. California?
If he was to have prostate cancer, it would have already showed up. It's my experience of people older than me that if you get past 75 with all lights burning bright, they're likely to continue to do so for some considerable time. The people who are going to die of all that stuff by then are dead already. I have known four centenarians who could have run companies. They might have used a wheelchair to get around, but I seem to recall we already did that with the greatest president of the 20th century (who wouldn't stand a chance nowadays with the views we have on disability). I was just having a conversation this morning with the teacher who opened the door to my life, who is 98, and he still drives around in Z06 Corvette.
Okay, good stuff, TC. A tad anecdotal, with the exception of FDR. I am more cautious on this than you are and would add, unlike some here, a different VP is a must. How about Buttigieg?
I'm looking for LOL from you. High expectations on this Sunday afternoon. : 0 )
I think Pete would be better, but I don't know how you switch VPs nowadays. It's not like FDR, who had four different ones in four terms and nobody thought about it. Hasn't been done like that since.
As to the "anecdotal evidence," there's actually a lot of data that for the small minority that get past the mid-70s without getting the "ills of age" that "old age" is successful and not declining. Now that I have managed not to be mauled by a bear in my 40s like my sixth great grandfather, or stick a piece of uranium in the front pocket of my workpants for six weeks like my father, it's highly likely I will follow the path of six other male direct ancestors of whom I have knowledge, all of who lived actively into their 90s. Right now, I am 2 years younger than Biden, and according to my most recent physical this past summer, my doctor told me I am "in great shape for a 50 year old."
I agree with all the points you made and was less pulled into the Obama romance because of his inexperience.
Doesn't it make sense, however, to think about who other than Biden in case he suffers an appreciable decline or becomes incapacitated. Life expectancy for men in the US is 75. You are envisioning Biden beginning a second term at around the age of 83. Cardiovascular disease, strokes and prostate cancer are common to men his age and younger
As far as options, I would certainly wouldn't limit it to Buttigieg, but I do think he will have had quite a bit more of it than Obama and in the nuts and bolts and results departments. His work can be measured. Then of course who else -- any governors other than Mr. California?
If he was to have prostate cancer, it would have already showed up. It's my experience of people older than me that if you get past 75 with all lights burning bright, they're likely to continue to do so for some considerable time. The people who are going to die of all that stuff by then are dead already. I have known four centenarians who could have run companies. They might have used a wheelchair to get around, but I seem to recall we already did that with the greatest president of the 20th century (who wouldn't stand a chance nowadays with the views we have on disability). I was just having a conversation this morning with the teacher who opened the door to my life, who is 98, and he still drives around in Z06 Corvette.
Okay, good stuff, TC. A tad anecdotal, with the exception of FDR. I am more cautious on this than you are and would add, unlike some here, a different VP is a must. How about Buttigieg?
I'm looking for LOL from you. High expectations on this Sunday afternoon. : 0 )
I think Pete would be better, but I don't know how you switch VPs nowadays. It's not like FDR, who had four different ones in four terms and nobody thought about it. Hasn't been done like that since.
As to the "anecdotal evidence," there's actually a lot of data that for the small minority that get past the mid-70s without getting the "ills of age" that "old age" is successful and not declining. Now that I have managed not to be mauled by a bear in my 40s like my sixth great grandfather, or stick a piece of uranium in the front pocket of my workpants for six weeks like my father, it's highly likely I will follow the path of six other male direct ancestors of whom I have knowledge, all of who lived actively into their 90s. Right now, I am 2 years younger than Biden, and according to my most recent physical this past summer, my doctor told me I am "in great shape for a 50 year old."
Now that's a problem we can agree on. I'm quitting now when the quitting is good.
Another time I actually Laughed Out Loud!