The Supreme Court has told us that money = speech. The huge number of donations, many from first-time donors, spoke. Fellow Democrats spoke and endorsed. The delegates are firmly for Kamala. She masterfully dominated in the aftermath of Biden's announcement and endorsement. In absence of an actual ballot, what's undemocratic about that?
The Supreme Court has told us that money = speech. The huge number of donations, many from first-time donors, spoke. Fellow Democrats spoke and endorsed. The delegates are firmly for Kamala. She masterfully dominated in the aftermath of Biden's announcement and endorsement. In absence of an actual ballot, what's undemocratic about that?
The Supreme Court has told us that money = speech. The huge number of donations, many from first-time donors, spoke. Fellow Democrats spoke and endorsed. The delegates are firmly for Kamala. She masterfully dominated in the aftermath of Biden's announcement and endorsement. In absence of an actual ballot, what's undemocratic about that?