I apologize. I did read that and should have acknowledged it.
Like immigration, there’s vested interests on either side of the equation who just want things the way they are for some reason or another. I suspect money is only one of those reasons. They may attack each other as distraction, but ignore the proverbial log in their own eye.
However in this case, one really can’t put the onus on SCOTUS. They were merely dealing with the case at hand within the charter they have. Like I said, it’s just not that easy.
Did you not read where I pointed out that this is a problem both parties have contributed to?
I apologize. I did read that and should have acknowledged it.
Like immigration, there’s vested interests on either side of the equation who just want things the way they are for some reason or another. I suspect money is only one of those reasons. They may attack each other as distraction, but ignore the proverbial log in their own eye.
However in this case, one really can’t put the onus on SCOTUS. They were merely dealing with the case at hand within the charter they have. Like I said, it’s just not that easy.