9 Comments
⭠ Return to thread

So good to hear! But that’s concerning about the 70% of electors saying they won’t certify a Harris win. Alarming. Actually, very alarming.

Expand full comment

This 2021 post from Democracy Docket explains how elections are certified from the ground level up. As a volunteer election worker in my small Massachusetts town, I have witnessed this at the most local level. I'm pretty sure that Democracy Docket and many other organizations -- not to mention the Harris campaign -- will be monitoring this in the districts and states that are likely to cause trouble. https://www.democracydocket.com/analysis/after-election-day-the-basics-of-election-certification/

Expand full comment

Yes. And here's an article from the Brennan Center about why they won't succeed. https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/analysis-opinion/election-denial-cant-overcome-election-certification-protections

Expand full comment

I need more details on that. I seem to recall each state has two sets of electors, so I would think if Harris carries the state her electors go forward, regardless of what the state thinks.

Expand full comment

The state has to certify the election. That's where the problem is, that 70% of election deniers are in the local/county/state election commissions.

Expand full comment

A reader has pointed out that Maddow said 70 election officials, not 70%. So there's a problem, but not ginormous.

Expand full comment

PHEW! 70% vs. 70. A huge difference! Thank you for the correction!

Expand full comment

70 In critical places could wreak havoc

Expand full comment

They are doing it in plain sight. Likely not even worried that the SC will back them. Very alarming indeed…

Expand full comment