Your analysis of President Biden -- and other Democrats of his generation -- is exactly right. Despite the evidence, which has been out in plain sight for several decades now, they can't accept that the venerable two-party system -- where the two parties had different priorities but were both committed (more or less) to democracy -- is g…
Your analysis of President Biden -- and other Democrats of his generation -- is exactly right. Despite the evidence, which has been out in plain sight for several decades now, they can't accept that the venerable two-party system -- where the two parties had different priorities but were both committed (more or less) to democracy -- is gone gone gone. The question now is about what *principles* you're loyal to, not what *party*. It should be a no-brainer. It is a no-brainer -- and those who hesitate will wind up on the ash heap of history.
Agreed, but with an asterisk. Biden campaigned on the idea that he could reach across the aisle, and it would make sense for him to cite examples where that succeeded--just as his campaign let everybody know it when republicans claimed credit for what they didn't do, which unfortunately didn't get enough attention thanks to Nepo Baby Sulzberger, Maggie Judith Miller Haberman, and the rest of The New York Times non-journalists involved in election "coverage."
Your analysis of President Biden -- and other Democrats of his generation -- is exactly right. Despite the evidence, which has been out in plain sight for several decades now, they can't accept that the venerable two-party system -- where the two parties had different priorities but were both committed (more or less) to democracy -- is gone gone gone. The question now is about what *principles* you're loyal to, not what *party*. It should be a no-brainer. It is a no-brainer -- and those who hesitate will wind up on the ash heap of history.
Agreed, but with an asterisk. Biden campaigned on the idea that he could reach across the aisle, and it would make sense for him to cite examples where that succeeded--just as his campaign let everybody know it when republicans claimed credit for what they didn't do, which unfortunately didn't get enough attention thanks to Nepo Baby Sulzberger, Maggie Judith Miller Haberman, and the rest of The New York Times non-journalists involved in election "coverage."
“Across the aisle” is a joke these days. When chump said he was going to be a president for all the people, I expected a lightening strike.
The magas are irredeemable and should be quarantined socially because they represent a severe malignancy in the body politic.
They pretty much are in my world.