It's now a 4-4 decision & apparently, the Chief Justice will give us a dissertation on his "hypothetical" that being of a "hypothetical" President who does an "official act" like appointing an Ambassador but, then sells the official act appointment for 1 Millions dollars.
It's now a 4-4 decision & apparently, the Chief Justice will give us a dissertation on his "hypothetical" that being of a "hypothetical" President who does an "official act" like appointing an Ambassador but, then sells the official act appointment for 1 Millions dollars.
The answer holds no weight because such BS does not answer the the "question precedented" by the unanimous 3 Judge Appellate Panel. In legal terms, the answer would be dicta with no case-law value for "years to come".
Appallingly, Alioto would not discuss the facts of the case upon which CERT was granted.
Thank you. JAMELLE BOUIE!
It's now a 4-4 decision & apparently, the Chief Justice will give us a dissertation on his "hypothetical" that being of a "hypothetical" President who does an "official act" like appointing an Ambassador but, then sells the official act appointment for 1 Millions dollars.
The answer holds no weight because such BS does not answer the the "question precedented" by the unanimous 3 Judge Appellate Panel. In legal terms, the answer would be dicta with no case-law value for "years to come".
Appallingly, Alioto would not discuss the facts of the case upon which CERT was granted.