Krugman nailed it, but The Times actually published my comment:
The problem that Krugman doesn't address is that the so-called political reporters and editors at the newspaper for which he writes are guilty under Article III, Section 3 of the US Constitution of abetting treason through the assistance they regularly have given to Donald Trump.
Krugman nailed it, but The Times actually published my comment:
The problem that Krugman doesn't address is that the so-called political reporters and editors at the newspaper for which he writes are guilty under Article III, Section 3 of the US Constitution of abetting treason through the assistance they regularly have given to Donald Trump.
Krugman nailed it, but The Times actually published my comment:
The problem that Krugman doesn't address is that the so-called political reporters and editors at the newspaper for which he writes are guilty under Article III, Section 3 of the US Constitution of abetting treason through the assistance they regularly have given to Donald Trump.
Wow.
Is your comment still published?
Still there, but I find it interesting that only "three" recommend it, so I wonder if they are up to something.
Given what one sees from most of the "regular commentators" there, that really doesn't surprise me.