I read this same article at TPM in the Editor's Blog. Nearly word for word.
Primary source, derivative, but "nearly word for word" is a big stretch.
Some parts are word for word the same.
Attributions are missing on someoneтАЩs part.
Did you miss Diane Francis on this? Lots are talking about
Musk/Ukraine.
Check out Just Security, WaPo. Guess you need to widen your reading horizons
a bit. I don't mean that as an
insult, just as a idea for future
reference.
I just thought the phrases tracked too similarly, too many of them. I know the same story is covered in many places, just go compare the two and see if you agree.
Sure. TC needs to show attribution and quotes on
some of his "included" remarks. That should clear
clearup anyone's puzzling.ЁЯСН
I agree
undefined subscriptions will be displayed on your profile (edit)
Skip for now
For your security, we need to re-authenticate you.
Click the link we sent to , or click here to sign in.
I read this same article at TPM in the Editor's Blog. Nearly word for word.
Primary source, derivative, but "nearly word for word" is a big stretch.
Some parts are word for word the same.
Attributions are missing on someoneтАЩs part.
Did you miss Diane Francis on this? Lots are talking about
Musk/Ukraine.
Check out Just Security, WaPo. Guess you need to widen your reading horizons
a bit. I don't mean that as an
insult, just as a idea for future
reference.
I just thought the phrases tracked too similarly, too many of them. I know the same story is covered in many places, just go compare the two and see if you agree.
Sure. TC needs to show attribution and quotes on
some of his "included" remarks. That should clear
clearup anyone's puzzling.ЁЯСН
I agree