Keep in mind that all the top Democrats and donors are probably in Trump's cross hairs if he wins. They probably have more to lose than an election and they're no doubt feeling the effects of the Trump v. USA decision. It was intended to shock, and looks like it's working.
Keep in mind that all the top Democrats and donors are probably in Trump's cross hairs if he wins. They probably have more to lose than an election and they're no doubt feeling the effects of the Trump v. USA decision. It was intended to shock, and looks like it's working.
Yes, to keep the strong in awe, so to speak, although it was supposed to be conscience and not a twisted interpretation of the Constitution that did that. But I was more worried about the vulnerable, those without ample means to ride out the hurricane.
Which is why we're going to have to choose to vote regardless, to protect our friends and family, since we are all in one or the other of the groups they want to harm.
Keep in mind that all the top Democrats and donors are probably in Trump's cross hairs if he wins. They probably have more to lose than an election and they're no doubt feeling the effects of the Trump v. USA decision. It was intended to shock, and looks like it's working.
Yes, to keep the strong in awe, so to speak, although it was supposed to be conscience and not a twisted interpretation of the Constitution that did that. But I was more worried about the vulnerable, those without ample means to ride out the hurricane.
Which is why we're going to have to choose to vote regardless, to protect our friends and family, since we are all in one or the other of the groups they want to harm.