Discussion about this post

User's avatar
GarySanDiego's avatar

I am not sure where this post might be going, but I will give it a try.

The Republican Party is a complicated thing. It has always been the home of the uncompromising absolutists. When it got started, that was a good thing. It’s good that the Republican Party would not compromise on slavery, unlike the Democrats of that time. It has also always been the home (until 6 years ago) of finance capitalism, which curiously works hand-in-glove with abolition but that’s too complex a topic for here.

After the Civil War, without slavery to focus on, the Republicans’ absoluteist instincts were directed towards finance capitalism. Maintaining economic hegemony became so important to the Republicans that they even gave up Reconstruction in order to maintain their hold on the executive branch (the Tilden-Hays debacle), so that they could continue to pursue the development of capitalism. In the ensuing years, anyone who opposed their economic program were socialists, people to be shunned and oppressed. Oddly, the unreconstructed southerners were using the same language to oppose the franchise for blacks, claiming that blacks were just voting for government handouts and thus essentially socialists.

The GOP and unreconstructed southerners moved in tandem for a couple generations, never quite merging but using the same frame of reference for discussing economic matters. This started to change with the civil rights movement in the 1950s and the southern claim of states rights. Within the GOP there was a certain sympathy with the state rights concept as it resonated with the GOP desire to circumscribe the role of government in economic matters. The GOP and unreconstructed southerners started to merge, however, when Kevin Phillips and Richard Nixon realized that the civil rights act of 1964 and the voting rights act of 1965, would allow them to peel off the South from the Democratic Party coalition, aided in part by the common framing for economic matters used by the GOP and southerners.

In the decades that followed the absolutist party become ever more dependent on the Southern white diaspora for electoral victory. The same party that would throw blacks under the bus to keep the Presidency became dependent on people who would throw blacks under the bus just for sport. Honestly, it’s no wonder that the GOP has proven to be such a threat to democratic process. It is a party with absolutist tendencies to begin with that is now dependent upon those people who have the least regard for a broad franchise. It is a toxic combination that on a good day embraces authoritarianism, and on a bad day is proto-fascist.

Expand full comment
Judith Swink (CA)'s avatar

Paradically? Imagistic? At least reify is a real word although I had to look it up for a definition. Not sure how if fits into his rant.

reify rē′ə-fī″, rā′- transitive verb

To regard or treat (an abstraction) as if it had concrete or material existence.

The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts