Discussion about this post

User's avatar
GarySanDiego's avatar

My complements on the polemics. A saber in one hand and a foil in the other. This was fun to read.

One might think that these radicals would be a bit circumspect in taking a “lazy, clumsy, and malicious” approach to legal analysis, especially relying on history as the touchstone. Historians are constantly going at each other with different facts uncovered and analyses contrived to reach contradicting interpretations. Maybe they really are sort of stupid and unschooled (and never read A.J.P. Taylor’s “The Origins of the Second World War”). On the other hand, maybe they intend to ensure that the democratic process will never again be able to create the prospect of Supreme Court nominees who are not radical “conservatives.” I’m pretty sure that the GQP intends to create litigation around the 2024 election that will make its way to SCOTUS, which will by a vote of 6-3 find for whomever the Republican candidate is. And that will be the end.

Expand full comment
Karen RN's avatar

This Supreme Court (minus 3 and we know who they are) are not only an insult to our intelligence but a clear and present danger to our freedom and democracy. Put in to the court by the oligarchs dark money, they will take away our rights that don’t fit in with their radical religious dogma to keep the people obedient. This is fascism creeping in and we have to stop it

Expand full comment
29 more comments...

No posts