Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Mim Eisenberg (NYer now in GA)'s avatar

It's better than a disastrous default, but I hope the Great Compromiser did not put us in a position where this can continue to happen. I also don't like that there was not a cent taken from the military budget. Was it "60 Minutes" that recently did an exposé of how military contractors obscenely inflate prices? Why were they not targeted? Why is there to be new work requirements for certain people getting government aid? That's hitting below the belt. The compromise should have included higher taxes for those making more than $400,000 a year and especially the multi-kajillionaires. It should have removed the ceiling for the Social Security payroll tax, which now stops for anyone making more than $160,200. Yes, that increased 9% from 2022, but still... But the compromise seems one-sided: to reduce spending. It doesn't increase income.

Expand full comment
Art Weber's avatar

“Old age and treachery will always beat youth and exuberance”

I think Biden’s doing several things at once:

-Playing the longer game, eyes on 2024 …

taking the calculated risk (which he must) that he’ll then emerge with majorities.

(thoughout this whole needless mess, a gazillion attack ad possibilities have been handed to the Dems)

-Teaching the kids, who have no memory or understanding of it, about compromise - how painful it is, but how necessary for getting anything done.

- Letting the opposition save face … giving away one slice but preserving the cake across several fronts.

example: the IRS can do plenty with 70, rather than 80 billion.

Biden’s willing to wear the ‘cloak of blame’ for the greater good, something not many politicians today could bear.

Expand full comment
44 more comments...

No posts